Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
Score 174

The statement and the conversation it replies to engage in public discourse by discussing the integrity and transparency of the Democratic nomination process. The original tweet by @JordanChariton critiques the process, suggesting a lack of debates, media blackout of challengers, and cancellation of primaries, which are significant public issues. The reply expresses agreement and gratitude for raising these concerns.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm and instead supports a critique of a public process, which can be seen as constructive. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on the process rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By agreeing with the critique, the statement promotes understanding and empathy towards those who feel disenfranchised by the process. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by supporting the critique without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its influence to highlight potential issues in the nomination process, aiming for the betterment of the democratic process. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles by engaging in a public debate responsibly. [+1]