Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement critiques President Biden's ability to serve another term, referencing interviews and comments made by public figures. It engages with public issues and contributes to civic dialogue, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a negative narrative about President Biden's capabilities. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others, including President Biden and the hosts mentioned. This is neutral.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is critical without offering constructive insights. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques public figures based on their public actions and statements. This is neutral.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to engage in public discourse. This is a minor alignment. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.