Gary Marcus

Rank 30 of 47
Score -6

The statement is a commentary on the future of pure LLMs (Large Language Models) in the context of AI development. It uses a historical analogy to suggest that while LLMs may be rapidly adopted, they will eventually be viewed as inadequate or obsolete.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It is a neutral observation about technology. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does encourage critical thinking about the future of AI. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a constructive critique of a technology. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the author's influence to contribute to a broader discussion about the future of AI, which can be seen as beneficial to society. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to share an opinion on a public issue. [+1]