Dileep George
@dileeplearning
·
572d
In reply to:
The statement by @GaryMarcus constitutes public discourse as it engages in a substantive discussion about the future and limitations of large language models (LLMs) in artificial intelligence (AI). The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, aiming to contribute to the ongoing debate about the efficacy and future of LLMs in AI.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It is a critique of a technology rather than an attack on individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing a perspective on the limitations of LLMs, which can foster a more nuanced discussion about AI. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of LLMs without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It focuses on the technology rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to contribute to a meaningful dialogue about AI. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.