Jill Stien

Rank 28 of 47
|
Score 32

The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely immigration policies and their enforcement under different administrations. It implies a comparison between the immigration policies of former President Trump and current President Biden, suggesting continuity in their implementation. The statement is critical and aims to highlight perceived inconsistencies or continuities in policy enforcement.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to a polarized debate on immigration policies. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of individuals by focusing on policy rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more accusatory in nature. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a critique without offering solutions. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the platform to highlight a public issue, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment, but it lacks a constructive approach. [+1]