Jill Stien

The statement by @DrJillStein and the subsequent conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with the public issue of immigration policies and their enforcement. The conversation critiques the current administration's immigration policies and compares them to those of the previous administration, highlighting concerns about ICE raids and their impact on communities.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement by @DrJillStein and the conversation aim to highlight and critique harmful immigration policies, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, the comparison between administrations could be seen as polarizing. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The conversation respects the privacy and dignity of individuals affected by the ICE raids by focusing on policy critique rather than personal attacks. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The conversation promotes understanding and empathy by bringing attention to the impact of immigration policies on communities, particularly Hispanic/Latinx residents. [+2]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The conversation engages in constructive criticism of immigration policies without resorting to personal attacks, maintaining a focus on policy issues. [+1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The conversation uses the platform to raise awareness about immigration policies and their impact, aiming to influence public opinion and policy for the betterment of society. [+2]