Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and the referenced conversation constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about political figures and their actions, which are public issues. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, with personal attacks and dismissive language.
- The statement and conversation violate the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. The language used is harmful and inflammatory. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and conversation do not respect the privacy and dignity of others, engaging in cyberbullying and harassment. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and conversation do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they foster division and hostility. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and conversation do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. They involve personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and conversation do not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly and with integrity. The use of the platform is not responsible and lacks integrity. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.