Jill Stien

The statement by @DrJillStein in response to @harrisonjaime constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically election integrity, campaign practices, and political accountability. The tone is defensive and accusatory, aiming to counter criticisms and promote a political campaign.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could escalate tensions. Minor violation. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does involve accusatory language. Neutral.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on defending the campaign and attacking the opponent. Violation. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than constructive criticism. Significant violation. [-2]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity due to its accusatory and confrontational nature. Minor violation. [-1]