The statement by Dr. Jill Stein constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues, specifically election integrity, campaign funding, and political opposition. The tone is defensive and accusatory, aiming to highlight perceived injustices against her campaign while soliciting donations.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a confrontational tone that could escalate tensions. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does accuse others of unethical behavior without concrete evidence. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on defending the campaign and attacking opponents. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments, particularly against Jaime Harrison. Significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight issues of election integrity and campaign funding, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. Minor alignment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the accusatory and confrontational tone. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.