Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the performance of a political figure in a debate and the implications for their career. The tone is critical but empathetic, acknowledging the difficulty of the situation for Biden.
- The statement strives to do no harm by framing the criticism in a way that acknowledges the difficulty and pain of the situation for Biden, rather than attacking him personally. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of Biden by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on the performance rather than personal attributes. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by recognizing the challenging nature of political decisions and the emotional toll they can take. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by focusing on the debate performance and the broader context of political decision-making, rather than resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.