Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and the referenced conversation involve a public debate between political figures and their supporters, addressing issues related to political campaigns and public perceptions. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, with elements of personal attacks and accusations.
- The statement and the referenced conversation do not strive to do no harm. The language used is confrontational and dismissive, which can contribute to a hostile environment. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and the referenced conversation do not respect the privacy and dignity of others. The language includes personal attacks and dismissive comments, which can be seen as a form of harassment. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and the referenced conversation do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. The tone is adversarial and does not seek to foster constructive dialogue. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and the referenced conversation do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. Instead, they involve personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. (-2 points)Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and the referenced conversation do not uphold the principles of free speech responsibly. While free speech is exercised, the manner in which it is done lacks integrity and responsibility. (-1 point)Â [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.