Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
132d
The statement and the linked conversation constitute public discourse as they engage with public issues, political figures, and debates relevant to the civic dialogue. The tone is confrontational and accusatory, reflecting a contentious political debate.
- The statement and linked conversation contain accusatory and confrontational language, which can be harmful and escalate tensions. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and linked conversation involve personal attacks and accusations, which can be seen as a form of harassment. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and linked conversation do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they contribute to a hostile and divisive atmosphere. This violates the principle of using words and actions to promote positive values. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and linked conversation engage in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than constructive criticism and dialogue. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and avoiding personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and linked conversation exercise free speech but do so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the accusatory and hostile tone. This partially upholds the principle of free speech but violates the responsible use of the platform. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.