In reply to:
TravisSpotter
@the367thday
·
362d
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
362d
Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
·
362d
The statement and the image constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive debate about political influence, campaign financing, and the integrity of public figures. The tone of the statement is accusatory and dismissive, suggesting that Jaime Harrison is 'bought' by the pro-Israel lobby, which implies a lack of independence or integrity. The image reinforces this accusation by highlighting the amount of money received from the pro-Israel lobby.
- The statement and image could be seen as harmful as they accuse a public figure of being 'bought,' which can damage their reputation without providing substantial evidence or context. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement and image do not respect the privacy and dignity of Jaime Harrison, as they make a serious accusation without a nuanced discussion or evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement and image do not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, they contribute to a polarized and accusatory discourse. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement and image do not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. They resort to personal attacks and ad hominem arguments rather than addressing the issues substantively. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement and image use the platform to influence public opinion but do so in a manner that may not contribute positively to societal discourse, as they focus on personal attacks rather than constructive debate. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.