Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97
7/10/2024, 11:42:28 PM
X
In reply to:
Aztech
@AztechGrande
·
362d
@DrJillStein @harrisonjaime Only liberals are fervently against a Trump presidency. If Trump wins again, my life will be the same as it has been since 2016. My vote is going to the Green Party.
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
362d
@harrisonjaime I’m not the one chipping away at Genocide Joe’s support, he does that every time he opens his mouth.

I'm getting votes from the majority of Americans who are already done with the 2-party trap. But you know that, that's why you pay your lawyers to kick me off the ballot, right?…
Jaime Harrison
@harrisonjaime
·
362d
Actually you just aren’t worth any more of my time.

But it seems you need something to do… just call Donald… he’s a big fan. You can get a group chat going with your other besties Vladimir and Kim.
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
362d
@harrisonjaime you haven't responded in a while. I guess you got a talking to 😂

The conversation involves a series of exchanges between multiple individuals discussing political candidates and their impact on the upcoming election. The tone varies from critical to dismissive, with some elements of sarcasm and personal attacks. The discussion touches on public issues such as election integrity, political endorsements, and the influence of third-party candidates.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The conversation includes personal attacks and dismissive comments, which can be harmful and do not promote constructive dialogue. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The conversation includes elements of cyberbullying and harassment, particularly in the dismissive and sarcastic remarks directed at individuals. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The conversation does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it focuses on criticism and personal attacks, which do not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The conversation lacks constructive criticism and instead engages in personal attacks and ad hominem arguments. This violates the principle of engaging in constructive criticism and dialogue without personal attacks. [-2]