Ilhan Omar

Rank 3 of 47
Score 346

The statement involves a public figure responding to a question about the cognitive abilities of a president, which is a substantive engagement with a public issue. The tone is confrontational and the intent appears to be to deflect criticism by pointing out perceived flaws in a previous president.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm; it implies cognitive decline in a former president without evidence, which can be harmful. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of the former president and can be seen as a form of verbal attack. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on deflection and criticism. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it resorts to a personal attack on the former president. [-2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement does not use the platform responsibly or with integrity; it engages in a tit-for-tat argument rather than addressing the issue constructively. [-2]