Marianne Williamson

Rank 13 of 47
|
Score 237

The statement 'Denying @DrJillStein the matching funds she has earned is deplorable.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue concerning the allocation of federal matching funds to a political campaign, which is a matter of public concern.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It expresses a strong opinion but does not use harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others. It does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting an issue of fairness in the political process. However, it does not explicitly promote empathy or compassion. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It criticizes an action (denying funds) rather than individuals. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to bring attention to an issue that could impact the fairness of the political process, which can be seen as an effort for the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address a public concern with integrity. [+1]