The statement critiques elected leaders for their reluctance to make ethical decisions, suggesting that they are not unique in facing such dilemmas. The tone is somewhat sarcastic and critical, aiming to highlight a perceived lack of integrity among public officials.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses a critical tone that could be seen as harsh. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for ethical behavior among leaders, which can be seen as aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly, addressing a public issue with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.