In reply to:
#LoveWarrior #TruthJusticeLove
@RedBeretsM4All
·
84d
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the omission of a political figure (Cornel West) in a public discussion. The tone is apologetic and reflective, aiming to address a perceived oversight.
- The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging a mistake and apologizing for it, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in any form of cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the oversight and apologizing for it. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the concern raised without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement acknowledges and corrects a mistake, which aligns with the principle. [+2]Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.