The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage in a substantive discussion about the suitability of a political candidate for public office. The tone is critical and evaluative, focusing on the age and perceived capabilities of the current President, while advocating for a different candidate.
- The statement aims to do no harm by focusing on the candidate's capabilities rather than personal attacks, but it does use language that could be seen as disrespectful ('reinvent grandpa'). [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of the President but does not fully respect his dignity, as it uses age-related language that could be considered dismissive or ageist. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the President's past strengths and contributions, but it also frames his current actions in a negative light.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing specific reasons for the endorsement of another candidate, but it also includes personal attacks ('ego and stubbornness'). [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses the platform to influence public opinion and advocate for a change in leadership, which can be seen as an attempt to better society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.