Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement by Jim Himes addresses a public issue, specifically the performance of President Biden and its potential impact on future elections. It is a substantive engagement with public concerns, making it a part of public discourse.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but raises concerns about potential risks, which is a legitimate part of public discourse. It neither significantly aligns with nor violates this principle.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public performance rather than personal attacks. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on raising a concern, so it neither aligns with nor violates this principle.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of a public figure's performance without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to raise a legitimate concern about public performance. It adheres to this principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.