Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Tristan Snell
@TristanSnell
·
367d
The statement appears to be a critique of perceived hypocrisy, suggesting that some individuals who are indifferent to severe issues like genocide are paradoxically concerned about marginalized groups. The tone is accusatory and confrontational, aiming to highlight a perceived inconsistency in priorities.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm; it uses strong language ('don't give a shit') that could be seen as inflammatory and harmful. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others; it implicitly accuses a group of people of hypocrisy in a harsh manner. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticizing others. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping generalization and could be seen as a personal attack. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does exercise free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity, given its accusatory and confrontational nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.