Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement encourages voters to consider alternatives to the two major presidential candidates, Biden and Trump. It appears to be a call to action aimed at promoting political engagement and challenging the status quo. The tone is assertive and somewhat critical of the current political options, but it does not engage in personal attacks or hate speech.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not cause harm with words or actions. It encourages voters to think critically about their choices without resorting to harmful language. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging voters to consider alternatives, which can lead to a more inclusive political dialogue. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of the political system without attacking individuals personally. It focuses on the broader issue of voter choice. [+1]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to encourage political engagement and challenge the status quo, which can be seen as an effort to better society. [+1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to encourage critical thinking and political engagement. [+1]