Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the fitness and capability of a sitting president to continue in office. The tone is critical and raises concerns about President Biden's health and fitness for the job, which is a matter of public interest.
- The statement does not appear to intend harm but raises a legitimate concern about the president's ability to perform his duties. However, it could be seen as undermining without substantial evidence, which might indirectly cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It questions the president's fitness in a manner that could be seen as respectful of his dignity, though it is critical.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not provide constructive dialogue or evidence to support the claim. It could be seen as a personal attack on the president's capabilities without offering a solution or engaging in a constructive manner. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to raise a public concern. However, the responsibility and integrity of the statement could be questioned due to the lack of supporting evidence for the claims made.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.