The statement constitutes public discourse as it addresses the quality of presidential debates, a significant public issue, and promotes an alternative debate event.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but uses the term 'embarrassing' to describe a previous debate, which could be seen as mildly negative.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It maintains respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by encouraging participation in a debate that presumably offers a more substantive discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It critiques the format of a previous debate rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to promote an event that aims to improve public discourse, which can be seen as beneficial for society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by promoting an open debate and uses the platform responsibly to encourage civic engagement. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.