Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -74

The statement and accompanying image constitute public discourse as they engage with political issues, specifically the withholding of funds by a government official and a call to action for a political rally. The tone is confrontational and uses strong language and imagery to frame the situation as a battle between an 'empire' and a 'rebellion.'

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses combative language ('fight back,' 'empire is desperate') which could incite strong emotions and potentially harm public discourse by framing the issue in a highly adversarial manner. This violates the principle of striving to do no harm with words and actions. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement and image do not respect the dignity of Janet Yellen, portraying her in a negative and villainous light. This violates the principle of respecting the privacy and dignity of others. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses divisive language and imagery, which can deepen societal divides. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses personal attacks and ad hominem arguments by depicting Janet Yellen as a villain. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses its platform to mobilize support for a political cause, which can be seen as using influence for societal betterment. However, the confrontational tone and negative portrayal of individuals undermine this positive aspect. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principle of free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, given the negative and combative framing. [-1]