Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Dr. Jill Stein🌻
@DrJillStein
·
370d
The statement critiques the lack of media coverage on an issue involving the Biden administration and Jill Stein's campaign funds, suggesting it would be scandalous in a healthy democracy. The tone is critical and implies a failure of the media to address a significant issue.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but its critical tone could be seen as divisive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does call attention to an issue that could be seen as promoting transparency.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does criticize the media broadly without specific constructive criticism.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a perceived injustice, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform to raise awareness of an issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.