Reposted by Andrew Yang🧢⬆️🇺🇸
The statement by @MikeLevin constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the leadership and future direction of the country. The tone is respectful and acknowledges President Biden's contributions while advocating for a change in leadership. The intent appears to be to initiate a conversation about the future leadership of the country.
- The statement strives to do no harm by acknowledging President Biden's contributions and expressing respect. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of President Biden and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by recognizing the positive aspects of President Biden's leadership while suggesting a change. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism without personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for what the speaker believes is the betterment of society by suggesting a leadership change. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly and with integrity. [+2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.