Marianne Williamson

Rank 14 of 47
|
Score 239
7/13/2024, 12:07:01 AM
X
In reply to:
CommonSense
@politicalindept
·
82d
@MikeJ_BagFiller @marwilliamson Doesn’t take much more than a quick google search to know that is pretty much how it is every time there in an incumbent running for reelection.
“Challengers to President Obama only qualified
for the ballot in eight states – New Hampshire, Missouri, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Texas,…
MikeJ Ⓥ 🛡
@MikeJ_BagFiller
·
82d
@politicalindept @marwilliamson This is not true at all. The 2024 primaries were not run in a normal way from previous primaries. There were numerous states that had different people on the voter ballot. Some states refused to allow some candidates on their ballot. It's undemocratic, and it will be the downfall
CommonSense
@politicalindept
·
82d
@marwilliamson I liked your platform. But here are the facts. Both parties have NEVER hosted debates during the re-election campaign of an incumbent. You say they didn’t give you a fair chance yet this primary was no different than the others.

Also you’ve never been in office even though it’s…
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
82d
On one hand I feel compassion for the president, and found myself feeling bad for how he was struggling during the press conference last night.

On the other hand I feel disdain for the level of arrogance and stubbornness that enables him to put the Democratic electorate through…

The statement by @politicalindept engages in a discussion about the democratic process and historical precedents in U.S. presidential primaries, which constitutes public discourse. The tone is factual and aims to provide historical context to the ongoing debate about the fairness and normalcy of primary challenges to incumbent presidents.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions. It provides historical context without inflammatory language. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by referencing historical events, which can foster a more informed discussion. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by providing a historical example to counter a point made in the conversation. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to a factual and historical discussion. [+1]