Vivek Ramaswamy

The statement and the preceding conversation involve a discussion on the topic of democracy and noncitizen voting, which are public issues. Therefore, it constitutes public discourse.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses a mocking tone ('Don’t be silly') and implies that Democrats are hypocritical, which could be seen as harmful and not conducive to constructive dialogue. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a dismissive tone that could undermine the dignity of others.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. Instead, it uses a mocking tone that could polarize the discussion further. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It uses a dismissive and mocking tone rather than addressing the argument substantively. [-1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement does exercise free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it mocks rather than engages in meaningful dialogue. [-1]