Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement discusses a serious public issue, specifically a shooting incident, and references a conversation about a BBC interview with a witness. This constitutes public discourse as it engages with a significant public concern related to safety and security.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but discusses a harmful event. It is neutral in this regard.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It respects the privacy and dignity of others by not revealing personal details of the individuals involved. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on relaying information about the event.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is focused on reporting what someone claimed to have seen. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to share information about a public concern responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.