In reply to:
The statement 'Biometric confirmation' is needed, since no ID on the individual.' constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to the identification of a potential shooter, which is a matter of public concern.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but it is neutral in its tone and intent. It simply suggests a method for identification.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by not revealing any personal information or engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a procedural aspect.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It is a straightforward suggestion. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly by contributing to the discussion on a public issue without causing harm or spreading misinformation. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.