Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement addresses a serious public issue, specifically the attempted assassination of a presidential candidate, and responds to public reactions and comparisons to a film. The tone is assertive and aims to clarify the reality of the situation while criticizing those who deny it.
- The statement strives to do no harm by clarifying the seriousness of the situation and condemning misinformation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not engaging in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, although it uses strong language ('deranged') to describe those denying the event.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it does aim to correct misinformation, which can be seen as a form of promoting understanding.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue with those in disagreement; instead, it uses a strong term ('deranged') which could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform responsibly to address misinformation and clarify the seriousness of the event. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.