Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement constitutes public discourse as it engages with a substantive public issue—namely, the impact and future of generative AI models. It raises concerns about the potential distractions caused by AI hype and calls for a more thoughtful approach to AI development.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words and actions. It raises a cautionary perspective without resorting to harmful language or actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by encouraging a nuanced discussion about AI, balancing skepticism with optimism. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the current AI hype without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By questioning the AI hype, the statement uses its influence to advocate for a more thoughtful and beneficial approach to AI development. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important societal issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.