Gary Marcus

Rank 26 of 47
|
Score 55

The statement addresses concerns about the development and deployment of generative AI systems, specifically GPT-5, and advocates for a shift towards more interpretable neurosymbolic approaches. It engages with public issues related to AI safety and reliability, making it a part of public discourse.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to prevent harm by cautioning against the use of unreliable AI systems, aligning well with this principle. [+2]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for more interpretable AI approaches, which fosters empathy and compassion for those affected by AI decisions. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive criticism of current AI practices without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]
  4. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    By advocating for safer and more interpretable AI systems, the statement uses influence for the betterment of society. [+2]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss important public concerns about AI. [+2]