Andrew Bates
@AndrewBatesNC
·
74d
The statement involves a critique of a public figure's comment about another public figure, which can be considered public discourse as it engages with public issues and debates about political leadership and communication.
- The statement uses clown emojis to mock the situation, which could be seen as doing harm through ridicule. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but the use of emojis could be seen as disrespectful. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue and instead uses ridicule, which is a significant violation. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech but does so in a way that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to the mocking tone. This is a minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.