In reply to:
Ali Minai
@barbarikon
·
101d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
101d
The statement is part of a public discourse about the accuracy of AI responses, specifically ChatGPT's ability to correctly compare numerical values. The tone is critical and aims to highlight the importance of accuracy in AI responses. The statement encourages others to read a detailed thread for better understanding and emphasizes that partial correctness is insufficient.
- The statement does not cause harm and instead aims to correct a potential misunderstanding, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By encouraging others to read the entire thread, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, as it seeks to provide a comprehensive view of the issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the need for complete accuracy without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.