Reposted by Jake Tapper
The statement provides a factual recount of President Biden's actions regarding the Supreme Court and expresses skepticism about the likelihood of legislative changes passing through Congress. The tone is informative and somewhat critical, focusing on the practical challenges of implementing proposed changes.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm; it is a factual recount and a critical analysis of the legislative process.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, focusing on public actions and policies rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing context about the commission and the legislative process, though it could be seen as dismissive of potential changes.Ā [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by highlighting the challenges of passing legislation, without resorting to personal attacks.Ā [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.