Marianne Williamson

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 265
7/18/2024, 5:20:21 AM
X
In reply to:
petebray
@petebray
·
71d
@marwilliamson If we lower corporate taxes, we improve corporate output and growth. This benefits workers, consumers, and small businesses. Let's do it!
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
71d
Trump says he wants to cut the corporate tax rate to 15%.

That would be a $50B combined giveaway to Fortune 100 corporations - more than all our federal spending on K-12 education.

Over time, better educating America's children will do far more to expand the U.S. economy than…

The statement '@petebray The 1980's want their fantasy land back.' is a sarcastic and dismissive response to a discussion about corporate tax rates and their impact on the economy. It does not engage substantively with the arguments presented and instead resorts to a flippant remark.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm, but its dismissive tone could contribute to a negative atmosphere in the discussion. Minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Neutral.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It dismisses the previous argument without providing a constructive counterpoint. Violation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It resorts to a personal attack by implying that the previous argument is outdated and unrealistic. Significant violation. [-2]