Marianne Williamson

The statement by @pattyisright constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue, specifically the allocation of resources and tax policies in the United States. The tone is assertive and critical, aiming to counter the previous statement about immigration and resource allocation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a polarized debate.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more confrontational. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is more of a rebuttal without addressing the underlying concerns of the opposing view. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses influence to highlight an issue of public concern, but it does so in a divisive manner.
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech but could be more responsible and constructive in its approach.