The statement expresses frustration with Democratic leaders for not addressing leaks and suggests that this lack of response is damaging the party's image. The tone is critical and calls for accountability from public figures.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly, but the critical tone could be seen as harsh.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; it is more focused on criticism.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not resort to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement does not address the principle of acknowledging and correcting mistakes.Principle 5:I will acknowledge and correct my mistakes.
- The statement uses influence to call for better leadership, which can be seen as aiming for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to call for accountability, which aligns with responsible use of influence. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.