The statement addresses a recent Supreme Court decision and its implications for the administrative state, which is a substantive public issue. The tone is assertive and calls for action, specifically to 'shut it down,' which suggests a strong stance on the matter.
- The statement does not directly cause harm with words and actions, but the aggressive tone could incite divisive reactions. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on a call to action. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it is a directive statement. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for a specific political action, which could be seen as aiming for societal betterment from the speaker's perspective. Adheres to the principle. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech and uses the platform to express a viewpoint, but the responsibility and integrity of the call to 'shut it down' can be questioned. Minor violation. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.