Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement and the conversation it refers to constitute public discourse as they engage with a significant public issue, namely the Israel-Palestine conflict and its humanitarian implications. The tone is highly critical and accusatory, focusing on the actions of Israel and the perceived inaction of the global community.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful and inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than promoting peace. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech directly, but the accusatory tone could be seen as disrespectful and lacking in dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion; instead, it uses charged language that may deepen divisions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it makes a sweeping accusation without offering a path to resolution. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to draw attention to a serious issue, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion for the betterment of society. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be considered responsible or with integrity due to its inflammatory nature. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.