In reply to:
wasserman
@adamzwasserman
·
99d
Gary Marcus
@GaryMarcus
·
99d
The statement 'Most of the influencers here using the word exponential aren’t mathematicians lol' is a lighthearted, somewhat dismissive comment on the misuse of the term 'exponential' by influencers who may not have a strong mathematical background. It is a response to a conversation about the performance of large language models (LLMs) and the use of mathematical terminology in that context. The tone is casual and slightly mocking, but it does not engage deeply with the substantive issues being discussed, such as the benchmarking of LLMs or the technical accuracy of terms used in public discourse.
- The statement does not cause harm but could be seen as dismissive towards influencers, which might be considered a minor violation of promoting understanding and empathy. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does not fully respect the dignity of others, as it mocks influencers. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on mocking the misuse of a term. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it is more of a dismissive remark rather than a substantive critique. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.