The statement discusses the performance of GPT-4 compared to GPT-3.5 in the context of a new benchmark by Wolfram Research. It highlights the significant improvement in code generation by GPT-4 and expresses concern about the lack of further advancements. The tone is analytical and somewhat critical, focusing on the implications of the benchmark results for the future of LLM development.
- The statement does not cause harm and is focused on discussing technological advancements and their implications. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by providing information about the benchmark and the performance of different LLMs. It encourages readers to consider the current state and future of LLM development. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by pointing out the need for further advancements in LLM technology. It does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss the betterment of LLM technology, which can have broader societal implications. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.