Rashida Tlaib

Rank 4 of 47
|
Score 354

The statement addresses a public issue related to the auto insurance industry's use of non-driving factors to set rates, which is a substantive engagement with public concerns. The tone is assertive and calls for legislative action (the PAID Act) to address perceived discrimination in insurance practices.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not use harmful language and aims to address a perceived injustice, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others and does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding and empathy by highlighting an issue that affects many people, particularly those in Detroit. [+2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments; it focuses on the issue at hand. [+2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by calling for legislative action to address discrimination. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech principles and uses the platform responsibly to discuss a public issue with integrity. [+2]