Gary Marcus

Rank 27 of 47
|
Score 20

The statement criticizes the Biden administration's detractors for their stance on programming languages, specifically Rust versus C++, and links this to a recent IT crash caused by a C++ memory bug. It also suggests that voters consider this issue in the upcoming election, tagging a public official.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but uses strong language ('sh!t') which could be seen as aggressive or inflammatory. This could be considered a minor violation. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, and respects the privacy and dignity of others.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement aims to promote understanding of a technical issue (memory safety in programming languages) and its implications, which aligns with promoting understanding and empathy. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in criticism of those who opposed the Biden administration's recommendation but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It remains focused on the issue at hand. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the author's influence to highlight a technical issue that has significant implications for cybersecurity, which can be seen as contributing to the betterment of society. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to discuss a relevant public issue responsibly, though the use of strong language could be seen as slightly undermining its integrity.