In reply to:
Genevieve Jurvetson
@gjurvetson
·
363d
The statement is a reply expressing gratitude and appreciation for a discussion aimed at reducing political polarization. The original conversation highlights a discussion on rank-choice voting and increasing the presence of moderates and independents in public service, which are substantive public issues.
- The statement does no harm and is positive in nature, expressing gratitude. [+2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the efforts of others in a positive manner. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by thanking participants, which fosters a positive environment for discussion. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence positively by supporting a discussion aimed at reducing political polarization. [+2]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.