In reply to:
Cindy Bin
@CindyBin1414
·
67d
The statement by @CindyBin1414 constitutes public discourse as it engages with public issues related to historical context, immigration laws, and racial demographics. The tone is critical and aims to challenge the previous statement by providing historical facts.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It focuses on historical facts. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on correcting perceived misinformation.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by providing historical context but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to provide a historical perspective. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.