Andrew Yang

The statement is a politically charged message addressing the potential implications of a second Trump presidency and the agenda of MAGA Republicans. It calls for action by suggesting that Joe Biden should pass the torch to a more energized nominee. The tone is urgent and partisan, aiming to mobilize support for a political cause.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement does not directly engage in harmful language but uses strong political rhetoric. It does not explicitly violate the principle of doing no harm, but the tone could be seen as divisive.
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It criticizes political figures and agendas but does not attack individuals' privacy or dignity. [+1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement aims to promote a vision of an inclusive America but does so through a partisan lens. It does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those it criticizes.
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue. It is more of a call to action against a political opponent rather than an invitation for discussion. [-1]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its influence to advocate for political change, which can be seen as an attempt to better society from the perspective of the speaker's political stance. [+1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion. However, the responsibility and integrity of the message can be debated due to its partisan nature. [+1]