Rashida Tlaib

Rank 5 of 47
|
Score 350

The statement addresses a significant public issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and the actions of the Israeli military and settlers in response to judicial pronouncements. The tone is serious and urgent, aiming to draw attention to perceived injustices and violence.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight harm being done to Palestinians, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. However, it could be seen as potentially inflammatory, which might indirectly contribute to harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make strong accusations against specific groups, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement seeks to promote understanding and empathy for the plight of Palestinians, but it does so in a way that could be seen as one-sided and lacking in compassion for all parties involved.
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, but it does not invite constructive dialogue or criticism either.
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses the speaker's influence to draw attention to a significant issue, which can be seen as an attempt to better society by advocating for justice. [+2]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds the principles of free speech and uses the platform to address a public concern, but the responsibility and integrity of the statement could be questioned due to its potentially inflammatory nature. [+1]